<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking with Tim &#187; logos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkingwithtim.com/wordpress/tag/logos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkingwithtim.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Pop culture interviews by Tim O'Shea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 03:38:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Design: Considering Logos</title>
		<link>http://talkingwithtim.com/wordpress/2009/12/17/design-considering-logos/</link>
		<comments>http://talkingwithtim.com/wordpress/2009/12/17/design-considering-logos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media industries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logo RIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediaite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Bump]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingwithtim.com/wordpress/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before today, I&#8217;ll be honest and admit I had never read the critical analysis of Philip Bump. But after reading his brief consideration of the past decade in logos, I will be sure to read him increasingly more going forward. One of Bump&#8217;s valid points in evaluating logos of the past is: &#8220;The web, in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before today, I&#8217;ll be honest and admit I had never read the critical analysis of Philip Bump. But after reading his brief <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-decade-in-logos/" target="_blank"><strong>consideration</strong></a> of the past decade in logos, I will be sure to read him increasingly more going forward. One of Bump&#8217;s valid points in evaluating logos of the past is:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;The web, in essence, is the photo album brought out to show what a logo looked like in its awkward phase – and for that, it should be praised.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I also greatly appreciate this post by Bump, because it introduced me to <a href="http://www.logorip.com/" target="_blank"><strong>Logo RIP</strong></a>, a virtual graveyard for discarded commercial logos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkingwithtim.com/wordpress/2009/12/17/design-considering-logos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

