Posts Tagged Rolling Stone

Kevin Avery on The Life and Writings of Paul Nelson and Conversations with Clint

Article first published as Kevin Avery on The Life and Writings of Paul Nelson on Technorati.

The Life and Writings of Paul Nelson

From the 1960s to the early 1980s, Paul Nelson was known for writing passionate, insightful criticism of folk and rock music that showed a partiality for singer-songwriters. He, and his record collection, was of great importance to Bob Dylan early in his career. As an editor at Rolling Stone, he influenced many great critics, such as Charles M. Young and Mikal Gilmore. But suddenly, in the early 1980s, when editorial decisions at Rolling Stone ran contrary to his thinking, Nelson walked away from music criticism. In fact, he dropped out of criticism entirely, choosing to spend his remaining years in relative obscurity, working at a video rental store. He died in 2006, but not before writer Kevin Avery contacted him about a potential biography. After Nelson’s death, Avery was tapped to compile this new Fantagraphics book, Everything Is An Afterthought: The Life And Writings Of Paul Nelson, in which Avery documented Nelson’s career as well as collecting his writing. In addition to discussing this book, Avery also discussed his other Nelson-related book that he edited, Conversations with Clint: Paul Nelson’s Lost Interviews with Clint Eastwood, 1979-1983 (Continuum Books). To mark the release of both books, Avery recently allowed me to interview him via email.

Not to toss a large question your way, but how did Paul Nelson help to shape present day rock criticism?

I’m probably the wrong person to ask. As a result of immersing myself in the music and criticism of the Seventies and Eighties, I really don’t follow rock criticism much anymore, but what I do read bears very little resemblance to the kind of writing that Paul did. Paul’s writing was more contemplative and expansive—in contrast to some of what I read today, which is dictated by time and space constraints (some of the very things that brought Paul’s tenure at Rolling Stone to an end in 1982).

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

Baron Wolman on The Rolling Stone Years

Article first published as Interview: Photographer BaronWolman on The Rolling Stone Years on Blogcritics.

Baron Wolman: The Rolling Stone Years

Only one person can lay claim to being Rolling Stone magazine’s first chief photographer-and his name is Baron Wolman. From 1967 to 1970, Wolman captured some of the most iconic images of musicians that graced the magazine’s pages. This August marks the release of The Rolling Stone Years, a collection of Wolman’s photographs from those three years, described by publisher Omnibus Press as consisting of “many … images from the late sixties and early seventies [that] have become iconic shots from rock’s most fertile era.” In addition to his amazing photos, Wolman writes a substantial amount about the early days of the influential magazine as well as his experiences photographing musical greats of the late 1960s/early 1970s.

At one point in the book, you express your preference to shoot in natural light. What is the appeal of using that kind of light for your photos?

Natural light is just that. “Natural.” Nothing artificial about it. What you see in the photo is what I saw when I took the picture. For the most part, flash disturbs the subject and ruins the intimacy of the moment…

What was more challenging to do, decide which pictures to run in the book or writing the text to accompany the pictures?

Both were challenging in the best sense of the word, not to mention the locales where the challenge was met: Paris, Santa Fe, Bangkok. I wanted to add some international “spice” to the process.

Some of your subjects died far too young, how hard was it to look at those pictures?

Not easy, of course. Wondering how their lives would have evolved had they had the opportunity, sad for such talent ended before it had a chance to soar, remembering the moments we shared.

Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , , , ,

No Comments

A Snippet of a Bad Interview: Dennis DeYoung Rolling Stone Q&A

So apparently someone at Rolling Stone thought its reading audience was dying for a Styx reunion. So they tried to stir up the possibility, by interviewing Tommy Shaw-and most recently, Dennis DeYoung.

And this is a bad interview-made mostly weak by poor editing. So DeYoung was a wiseass on the phone interview: shocking. But did we have to read every stupid joke he made? Here’s a snippet (interviewer questions in bold):

Thanks for calling.
Am I getting you at a bad moment? You having sex or something? You’re in the office, right?

Ha, yeah. I can talk.
Thank god.

Where are you calling from?
I’m calling from a telephone.

Gotcha. How’s your tour going?
Well, Andy, whenever they want a middle-aged white guy to sing high, I raise my hand. We do about 50 to 60 shows a year, depending on my prostate.

So how’s that doing these days?
Well, actually for man my age – I’ve seen worse.

So, I was reading . . .
I deny it! I deny all allegations, your honor! That maid is a liar!

Hard to believe that Rolling Stone stretched this Q&A to two unreadable pages.

, , , ,

3 Comments